Nationalism through Empowerment – The Hungarian Parliament’s address and The National Song of Hungary

In Hungary, a strong sense of patriotism and national pride fuels the urge of the public, and the Hungarian Parliament, for reform. In the Hungarian Parliament’s address, no less than a threat is made against the ruling monarch of the nation, pleading for reform, for,

“Your Majesty has not followed a constitutional direction, and consequently has been at variance with the independent character of our government. This alone has hitherto prevented the development of the constitutional system in Hungary; and it is clear that unless the direction can be changed, and Your Majesty’s government is made to harmonize with constitutional principles, the throne of Your Majesty, no less than the monarchy itself, endeared to us by the virtue of Pragmatic Sanction, will be placed in a state of perplexity and danger, the end of which we cannot foresee, and must entail unspeakable misery upon our country.”

It is hard not to see this as anything else but a veiled threat to the future of the monarchy if no action is taken to reform and appease the people of the nation. The fact that the document continues with advocating great measures of reform within the government gives the sense that the people were very much on board with what the parliament was pushing for, that being the expansion of political rights to the people.  Needless to say, any time the energy of the masses are swept up or channeled into a political movement, a great surge of patriotism results, sometimes expanding into nationalism.  Language in Alexander Petofi’s National Song of Hungary such as “freedom’s soil” and lines like “A miserable wretch is he, Who fears to die, my land, for thee!,” brings the idea of a nation advocating freedom and land that stands for such as being worthy of dying for.  An interesting parallel is the song “Battle Cry of Freedom” by Georgie Frederick Root, which is very similar with the lyrics, “Oh we’ll rally round the flag, boys, we’ll rally once again, Shouting the battle cry of freedom,” and “Oh we’re springing to the call for three hundred thousand more, Shouting the battle cry of freedom! And we’ll fill the vacant ranks with a million freemen more,” the only real difference in tone and language being that in the National Song of Hungary, the writer of the lyrics considers himself a slave to the monarchy with how the people at that time lacked a voice in government to better society and bring the lower class out of poverty. Where Root’s song uses both the flag and the term land as a way to symbolize the US, Petofi’s song uses solely the term land. Crucially is the use of the term “Magyar” in Petofi’s work, an ethnic and national group referring to the people of Hungary who had migrated there from the Ural Mountains in Russia.  Therefore, we see that while other songs of the period have a patriotic base with touches of nationalism, many with more nationalistic bases tend to incorporate terms which put an ethnic group at the center of the work.

The Deplorable Truth

A common thread throughout history is often that common people are trampled by the greed of the upper classes attempting to gain more power. In the winter of 1848, Tocqueville observed the growing anger of the peasantry and proletariat classes as they were continually disenfranchised and discriminatinated against.

He wrote, “The deplorable truth is that for jobs and a life at the public expense is not, with us, confined to any single party, but it is the great and permanent weakness of the nation itself…” (Page 33) This is true of France and many other countries not only during this time period but also still in the present.

How is this idea present not only present in France at this time but also across Europe and even in present day America? Do you agree with this sentiment or do you believe Tocqueville is being too pessimistic?

The Birth of Great Events

At the beginning of chapter 1, Alexis de Tocqueville states that major events like the February Revolution were based on accidental causes. “In common with all other great events of this sort, the February Revolution was born of general causes fertilized, if I may put so, by accidents” (page 62). While many sparks to revolutions or other “great events” may be spontaneous, it seems like a very bold statement to say that the revolution’s causes are made from accidents. In the paragraph following this quote, de Tocqueville talks about the industrial revolution. Do you think that the industrial revolution fits his category of a great event with causes made by accidents? What do you think his definition of a great event is? Do you agree that the February Revolution was based on causes made by accidents?

Historical Awareness-10/6

On page 62, de Tocqueville remarks, “In my life I have come across literary men who wrote histories without taking part in public affairs, and politicians whose only concern was to control events without a thought of describing them”. He makes it clear that he is aware of the historical context of his writing, unlike his peers who only look at the world from a historical context and do not try to change it, or those who try to change events without care for the potential consequences.

He knows that his recollections are important to history because he was there for the fall of the July Monarchy. With this in mind, how does this mindset affect his writing? Do you think he emphasized certain events looking back? Does this affect the credibility of the source at all? How does he talk about himself throughout this work, and how does he characterize other people? Is this important?

css.php